{"id":18,"date":"2017-06-27T16:39:57","date_gmt":"2017-06-27T16:39:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/teachingtemplatewalls.wordpress.com\/?page_id=2"},"modified":"2022-08-23T17:01:23","modified_gmt":"2022-08-23T21:01:23","slug":"home","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/","title":{"rendered":"Course Overview"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>\u201cNever believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u2015 Jean-Paul Sartre<\/p>\n<h1><b>Welcome<\/b><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">People have been trying to convince other people to do things with language for a very long time. And it\u2019s worked, human civilizations with their massive diversity and variety have sprang up and collapsed or even survived because of the massive power of language to convince, mold, and shape the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">possibilities<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> of thought and action. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">How<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> this is has happened as well as how it happens today is the fundamental question of the academic inquiry known as Rhetoric.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rhetoric has many definitions both operational and conceptual. Traditionally, at its core exists \u201cour,\u201d understanding of the rhetorical situation (i.e. the static communication triangle of author, text\/language, and audience) as well as shaping the world of possible actions and possible meanings through semiotic means both expanding and limiting our understanding of possible <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">actions<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. This course will focus on how different types of theoretical tools can be deployed to understand the influential nature of semiotic acts as well as some of the pitfalls that accompany such interactions. Fundamentally, this course will give you several ways to theorize rhetorical situations to understand <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">how<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> they work.<\/span><\/p>\n<h1><b>Learning Outcomes<\/b><\/h1>\n<h2><b><i>After this class, you will:<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">have several theoretical rhetorical tools that will allow you to understand <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">how<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> a rhetorical situation works to expand or limit possibilities for action<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">develop an understanding of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">why<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> rhetorical analysis has developed intellectually the way it has<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">become familiar with the deployed uses of rhetorical analysis, i.e. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">how <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">scholars have deployed rhetorical analysis to understand a given, or several, semiotic situation(s) and <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">when<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> it can be valuable<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">How bad faith actors can use rhetorical strategies to obfuscate, frustrate, and mislead audiences<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b><i>Some of the activities we will focus on include:<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">breaking down rhetorical situations to their identifiable elements<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">learning how logical fallacies can be recognized in persuasive works\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">intensive peer review work to improve feedback for both written and oral performances<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b><i>After this class, you will have produced:<\/i><\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">a visual\/textual rhetorical analysis of an argumentative text focused on logical fallacies<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">several written rhetorical analyses<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">a paper in which you will choose an appropriate rhetorical theory to analyze a given text or ecology<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">several feedback memos with the intention of improving your peers\u2019 work<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><b>Required Texts<\/b><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">All texts are available at the D. H. Hill Library Course Reserves both <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/reserves.lib.ncsu.edu\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">online<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (accessible with your NC State credentials) and materially at the reserves desk with a few noted exceptions. That said, I have worked very hard to make this class financially accessible and these texts are pretty cheap and make you look like a smart and interesting person on a bookshelf so you should probably pick them up.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Almossawi, A. (2014).<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/bookofbadarguments.com\/\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments<\/span><\/i><\/a> <span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(Illustrated edition). The Experiment.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keith, W. M., &amp; Lundberg, C. O. (2017). <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/textbooks.lib.ncsu.edu\/?utf8=%E2%9C%93&amp;department=COM&amp;course_number=411&amp;section=001\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Essential Guide to Rhetoric<\/span><\/i><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (Second edition). Bedford\/St. Martin\u2019s.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Toye, R. (2013). <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/textbooks.lib.ncsu.edu\/?utf8=%E2%9C%93&amp;department=COM&amp;course_number=411&amp;section=001\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rhetoric: A Very Short Introduction<\/span><\/i><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (Illustrated edition). Oxford University Press.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lib.ncsu.edu\/formats\/newspapers#historical-newspapers\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Historical Newspapers<\/span><\/i><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> archives. (n.d.). NC State Libraries. Retrieved August 8, 2022.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pessimistsarchive.org\/\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Pessimists Archive<\/span><\/i><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (n.d.). Retrieved August 8, 2022.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Humanities, N. E. for the. (n.d.). <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/chroniclingamerica.loc.gov\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Chronicling America<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> | Library of Congress.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>Video games<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/11bitstudios.com\/games\/this-war-of-mine\/\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This War of Mine (Complete Edition)<\/span><\/i><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. (2018). 11 bit studios.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><a style=\"background-color: #ffffff\" href=\"https:\/\/papersplea.se\/\"><i>Papers, Please: A Dystopian Document Thriller<\/i><\/a>. (2013) 3909 Studio.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cNever believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4592,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-18","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4592"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1001,"href":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18\/revisions\/1001"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eng411walls.wordpress.ncsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}